Solana casino UK: 13 of 30 coin lists name SOL

Of the seven tickers a British reader usually searches for, SOL sits at the bottom of the frequency table: thirteen of the thirty readable coin lists in our operator library name it, against twenty-nine for BTC and twenty-eight for ETH. That makes a solana casino UK shortlist the shortest of these pages and, unexpectedly, the one with the highest proportion of confirmed licence entries behind it — nine of the thirteen publish a number that came back current from a register, one comes back revoked and three were not returned at all. Two other things separate this column from its neighbours. It contains the only list in the library where SOL is published ahead of ether, and it skews heavily towards brands built around their own in-house games: nine of the thirteen carry a provably-fair tag against fourteen across all thirty. What follows is the count, that one ordering, the strong records that have no solana cell at all, the licence distribution with its numbers and dates, the house tokens sitting beside SOL, the two published ceilings, and the country lists.

Thirteen of thirty, the thinnest of the seven columns

The thirteen lists that name SOL belong to Bets.io, Cloudbet, CoinPoker, LTC Casino, Rainbet, Rakebit, Shuffle, Wild.io, CryptoGames, DuckDice, Wolf.bet, Sportbet.one and Playbet.io.

Seventeen lists do not. Six of those are short enough that the blank means nothing — one entry at Bitcoin.com Games and KatsuBet, two at Winz.io, three at Bspin, four at Mega Dice, five at Bitdreams. The other eleven publish six or more tickers and still leave solana off: CryptoLeo, Flush, Metaspins, Nitrobetting, Oshi Casino, PlayAmo, Rocketpot, TrustDice, Vave, Wild Fortune and Windice.

Thirteen against seventeen is the sharpest filter any coin column applies in this library, which cuts both ways. A solana casino UK shortlist is genuinely shorter than a bitcoin one rather than nominally shorter, so the cell carries information; but it also means the sample you are comparing across is small, and a small sample makes every other column noisier. Nine of the thirteen carry the provably-fair tag and six carry the original-games tag, against fourteen and ten across all thirty lists. In other words, the brands that build their own games are over-represented here, and the brands that mainly resell a games lobby are under-represented.

The ranked view across the whole library, with the coin column as one input of seven, is the scored table of the best crypto casinos UK shortlists keep returning to.

The only list that publishes SOL ahead of ether

One ordering in the solana casino UK set is unique in the library. Ether is second on almost every list and first on none. There is exactly one list where SOL is published above it, and it is the shortest list in the solana column.

Playbet.io publishes three tickers: BTC, SOL, ETH. That is the whole field. Bitcoin first, as in twenty-five of the twenty-nine lists that carry it, then solana, then ether third. No other operator in our files puts SOL ahead of ETH; the next earliest is third, on Rakebit’s fifteen-entry list, and the median position for solana across the thirteen is sixth. On Cloudbet’s forty-entry list SOL is sixteenth.

A three-name list is a deliberate document, and the second slot on it is the most contested space in the coin field. Playbet.io’s record around that decision is one of the fuller ones in the column: 7.5 out of 10 on six of the seven components, a Curaçao Gaming Authority licence numbered OGL/2024/1214/0712 returned Active by that authority’s certificate portal against company number 161842, and a separate Anjouan Gaming Board entry for the same domain under a different company, Aurevia Digital Ventures Ltd, dated 29 October 2025. Its verification wording sits at clauses 13.4 and 13.8: documents may be requested before a withdrawal is processed, further checks may be applied to any withdrawal at the operator’s discretion, and an account may be locked if the player cannot be reached within two weeks. Its restricted-country list runs to 30 entries and GB is on it.

Two registers naming two companies for one domain is a pattern that recurs across this library, and it is the reason we print the source line beside every holder name rather than the holder alone. The brand-level detail is in the record we keep for that brand.

Six strong records with no solana cell at all

If the coin column were a proxy for quality, the gaps in the solana casino UK set would be at the bottom of the table. They are not.

Six records in the upper half of the library, coin lists of seven to thirteen entries, and no solana on any of them. Rocketpot lists thirteen tickers and still omits SOL, which is the clearest single case: breadth of list and choice of network are separate decisions.

Meanwhile the column includes Sportbet.one at 3.3 with nineteen tickers and LTC Casino at 4.3 with ten. A solana casino UK page that ranked by coin breadth would put both of those above Wild Fortune, and both of them have four of seven components filled against Wild Fortune’s six. The coin count is worth 1.5 points of 10 in our scoring and the licence line is worth 2.5 for exactly this reason; the full arithmetic is on the method page.

Nine of thirteen hold a licence a register returned

This is where a solana casino UK shortlist does better than its neighbours. Nine of the thirteen publish a licence number that came back current when the registers were read on 26 August 2026.

Five are Curaçao Gaming Authority numbers in the OGL series, returned Active by that authority’s certificate portal: Cloudbet on OGL/2024/328/0599 under Halcyon Super Holdings B.V. against company number 148526, Shuffle on OGL/2024/1337/0628 under Natural Nine B.V., Wild.io on OGL/2024/210/0198 under Nonce Gaming B.V. against company 161858, CryptoGames on OGL/2024/1336/1047 under MuchGaming B.V. against company 153126, and Playbet.io on OGL/2024/1214/0712.

Four are Anjouan Gaming Board numbers in the ALSI series returned valid by that public register, each with a holder and an entry date: Rainbet on ALSI-152406029-FI2 under RBGAMING N.V. from 14 June 2024, CoinPoker on ALSI-202412004-FI1 under PRECISE INTERACTIVE INC from 5 December 2024, DuckDice on ALSI-202509013-FI1 under Zentari Limitada from 16 September 2025, and Rakebit on ALSI-202602030-FI2 under Nile King Media Ltd from 18 February 2026 — the most recent entry in this column.

Three publish a string no register returned: LTC Casino on 8048/JAZ attributed to Curaçao eGaming with no holder and no status, Wolf.bet on ALSI-132405048-FI3 under Cipher Games Ltd, and Sportbet.one on M.I.S.A. number G20190045 under Reedll Limited. A null in either register means the domain was not found there, which is not the same as saying a brand is unlicensed — it means we did not read it.

One comes back revoked. Bets.io publishes OGL/2024/1178/0479 under Bets Entertainment N.V., and the certificate portal returns that number with the status Revoked against company number 155648, while the Anjouan register lists the same domain under TESSERA LIMITED SRL from 18 October 2024. Our scoring gives the brand no rating at all rather than a reduced one, even though six of its seven components could be filled.

Three of the thirteen list a token of their own

Four brands in the whole library publish a house token among their coins, and this matters to a solana casino UK count because three of the four are in this column.

• Shuffle lists six tickers: BTC, ETH, LTC, SOL, USDT and SHFL. One in six is its own.
• Sportbet.one lists nineteen, including VAULTA and SBET.
• CryptoGames lists fifteen, including PLAY, and its list is the meme-heaviest in the set with SHIB and PEPE alongside.
• The fourth, TrustDice, lists TXT and does not list SOL.

We record a house token as a coin because the operator published it as one, and we draw no conclusion from it: our files hold nothing about what such a token settles against or how it is redeemed, so nothing is printed. It is worth knowing it is there, because a nineteen-entry list that includes two of the brand’s own names is not the same breadth as a nineteen-entry list of independent networks, and a solana casino UK comparison sorted on coin count would not notice the difference.

Shuffle’s wider record is one of the stronger ones here: 8.0 on six components, verification at clause 4.1 reserving document requests at any time and allowing withdrawals to be suspended once a risk-based threshold is reached with no figure stated, and a restricted-country list of fifteen entries with GB among them.

Two published ceilings out of thirteen

Fourteen operators across the whole hundred-name library state a withdrawal ceiling. Only two of them appear in a solana casino UK shortlist: Bets.io at 10,000 dollars per transaction, cited to clause 10, and Wild.io at 100,000 dollars per week, cited to clause 9.6.

Two of thirteen is the lowest density of published ceilings in any of the seven coin columns, and neither of the two is written in SOL. No figure anywhere in our files is denominated in solana; the only coin-denominated figures in the library are written in USDT. The rest of the column publishes no ceiling at all, and that is a blank rather than an absence of limits.

On verification the split is closer to even. Seven of the thirteen attach a clause number: Shuffle at 4.1, Bets.io at 5, Rainbet at 5.2 and 8.3, Playbet.io at 13.4 and 13.8, Cloudbet at 18.1.1, DuckDice in Section 2 and Wolf.bet in Section 5. Six do not: CoinPoker, LTC Casino, Rakebit, Wild.io, CryptoGames and Sportbet.one. Not one of the thirteen publishes a monetary verification threshold; across the whole library only five brands do, and none of the five is here.

Five of the thirteen also state a founding year — Cloudbet at 2013, CoinPoker and Sportbet.one at 2018, Wild.io at 2022 and Rakebit at 2024 — and eight leave the field null. The clause-by-clause version of all this is on the page that collects the document wording.

Seven of thirteen name GB, and what a solana casino UK page cannot say

Seven of the thirteen put GB in the restricted-country list they publish themselves: Rainbet, Rakebit, Shuffle, Wild.io, DuckDice, Wolf.bet and Playbet.io. The two that publish a list with no GB entry are Bets.io, at 42 entries, and Cloudbet, at two. Four have an empty cell: CoinPoker, LTC Casino, CryptoGames and Sportbet.one.

Among the seven, length runs from 11 entries at Rainbet and 13 at Rakebit through 15 at Shuffle, 16 at DuckDice, 30 at Playbet.io and 45 at Wild.io to 48 at Wolf.bet. That is a narrower spread than any other coin column produces; nothing here approaches the 216 and 224-entry lists that turn up in the litecoin and dogecoin columns. Short lists and long lists are different documents doing different jobs, and the reading of that difference sits on the page on when a country entry bites rather than being flattened into a tally.

An empty cell never means an operator accepts everyone. It means no list could be read, and saying so is a statement about our work rather than an accusation about theirs.

Three things this page does not carry and will not invent: no network fee for solana, no confirmation count before a deposit is credited, no measured payout time. Six of the thirteen claim instant withdrawals in tags they wrote themselves, and a tag is a claim rather than a measurement. Those cells are empty in our sources and they stay empty here. If you want the neighbouring column — the one where ten of the same operators overlap and five carry XRP without solana — it is on the XRP page, and the wider question of what a ranking built on this much missing data can honestly claim is taken up on the page on how much of this record is readable at all.